Influence of Japanese culture in Hawaii

Nixon Should Have Been Impeached! essays

Nixon Should Have Been Impeached! essays Had Richard M. Nixon not resigned as President of the United States on August 9th, 1974, he would have been impeached and removed from office. In June of 1972, a group of men hired by Nixon's reelection committee was caught breaking into the offices of the Democratic national headquarters in the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C. This break-in and attempted bugging were only part of a series of illegal activities conducted by the Nixon administration and the Committee to Re-Elect the President. The outcome of the Watergate scandal went beyond the public humiliation of Richard Nixon and the conviction and jailing of twenty-six White House officials and aides. The scandal had an extremely negative impact on the political system of the United States during the 1970s. Watergate contributed to a growing loss of faith in the federal government that originally stemmed from the public's opposition to the Vietnam conflict. The Watergate scandal was a major contributor to the downfall of Richard Nixon and his administration, however, there were other factors involved. The news of 3,500 secret bombings in Cambodia authorized by Nixon further discredited him and led to an act of Congress called the War Powers Act. The act limits the president's power over the military by forcing him to inform Congress of any authorized military action within forty-eight hours. The act also states that Congress would have to approve any military action that lasted more than sixty days. During the trial of the burglars accused of breaking into the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate complex in Washington, D.C., many questions had arisen. The investigative reporting of two reporters for the Washington Post, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, as well as the persistent questioning by United States District Court Judge John J. Sirica showed that a cover-up had concealed the burglar's activities. During the investigation there were indications...

Philosophy - Duties to Others Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Philosophy - Duties to Others - Essay Example There continues to be an obtuse vagueness as to the material aspirations and attainment in contrast to the practical accountability of individuals to be participative in the grander scheme of things. On a global setting and in the borderlessness we are admittedly or not living in, the question of the role of the people and of the government poses many different queries that should incorporate and answer their roles and impact. The lending hand that more affluent nations are extending determined to be enough to help other countries in dire need. At the same time, how are individuals classified and evaluated for their function in the alleviation of hunger that kills many people on a daily basis. Peter Singer argues that most people see it as the government’s role to give aid to the poor and that their personal responsibility to do so or to act directly toward its solution is secondary. People are generally bounded by their personal interests and that leads to the simple truth that only a few would be willing to partake in something that should be done in the first place if it impedes it. In spite of this, they should not be perplexed into doing what are inherent and obvious as perceived to be necessary steps which in actuality never or very seldom does happen (237). John Arthur’s rule for the greater moral evil rule is quite simple: â€Å"If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable importance, we ought, morally, to do it.† The best point that Arthur suggests is the considerable division of wealth that is necessary to implement these ideals. Bringing moral equality into the picture, both misery and bliss should be considered in the essential objectivity of the rule. It also brings into question the who of the situation. It should not undermine the